Double-Blind Peer Review
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process, ensuring an unbiased and fair evaluation of every manuscript.
1
Initial Editorial Screening
Scope, formatting, and suitability check by the editorial office.
2
Plagiarism Check
Mandatory similarity screening against published sources.
3
Reviewer Assignment
Minimum two independent expert reviewers are assigned.
4
Editorial Decision
Accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
5
Final Acceptance
Production, formatting, and open-access publication.
Possible Editorial Decisions
Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject
Review Timeline
Initial Screening
7 days
Review Process
3–6 weeks
Final Decision
6–8 weeks
Reviewer Confidentiality
Reviewer identities remain strictly confidential throughout and after the review process. This protects reviewers and ensures candid, objective feedback for every submission.